Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Grad student recreation

There are two basic schools of thought among grad students on how to spend recreational time:

1. Get drunk and avoid shop talk, except to bitch about shop; or
2. Get drunk and talk shop.

I fall firmly into the first camp. The stress and intellectual rigor of grad school are mentally exhausting. Before starting, I would have understood a phrase like "mentally exhausting" metaphorically, but now I know what it feels like for your mind to actually be tired, too tired to continue doing brain-like things. So when I don't have to think deeply about anything, I prefer not to. I like to drink High Life and yell at people about whatever I happen not to like at any given moment.

But I think I may be moving into the second camp. It's a biproduct of the economy. I'm growing to realize how slim my job prospects really are, and how little these years of grad school are likely to contribute to whatever career I use to make an honest living once I've finished my PhD. The "professor" thing may yet work out, but it's too much of an outside chance to be much of a motivator anymore. So I'm hoping to rejuvenate a little intrinsic interest in what I study--embrace the life of the mind, pursue knowledge for its own sake, etc etc.

What am I interested in? Good question. I've lost sight of that in the past couple of years. But here is the question that still bugs me more than any other: how does religion work? If religion is revealed by God, why are there so many, and why are they all so simultaneously contradictory yet plausible? And if they are purely a human contrivance, why are they so appealing, and why do they have such staying power. No single flip answer satisfies.

So expect more about that. Especially if you have a beer with me.

Sunday, January 10, 2010

Favorite Songs of the Decade #9, Coldplay, "Moses"

Anybody who knows me knows it's axiomatic that I hate Coldplay. This is largely because I cultivate the image of somebody who hates Coldplay; deep inside, I kind of like a few of their songs, and I feel mostly ambivalent about most of the rest. I mostly just loathe Chris Martin: that sexless falsetto warble, those self-important pseudo-profound lyrics, the sniveling yen to split the difference between the worst things about Bono and Thom Yorke.

But I have always thought that "Moses" is magnificent.

Everything is in place. It begins with a muted guitar string arpeggio, which leads to the core rhythm guitar riff, which sets the stage for one of my favorite guitar leads ever. It's not fancy, but it weaves in and out of the rhythm guitar perfectly--it feels like somebody searching desperately for something. Chris Martin's lyrics are innocuous and his vocal doesn't ruin the song, which is all I really ask for.

But what sets this song apart, what makes it GREAT, is the bridge. If you've ever talked to me about music over alcohol, you've probably gotten the "bridge" rant. I am convinced that the bridge is the pivotal moment in a pop song. Any fool can write two verses and a chorus; it's the bridge that distinguishes a great pop song from all the riffraff. Most Coldplay songs have shitty bridges. The bridge, for instance, ruins "Clocks," a wonderful song that peters out when it should be launching into the stratosphere.

"Moses" doesn't peter out. Starting at 3:23, the song strips down to just the rhythm guitar and Chris Martin's vocal. It hovers there for almost a minute, building on Martin's vocal, until it explodes. And then it ends, before the effect is lost. Very nearly a masterpiece. I love it.

Saturday, January 2, 2010

Favorite Songs of the Decade #10, U2 "Wild Honey"

Truthfully, I really do love this song. But the main reason it's on my list is #1) to piss you off and #2) to give me a pretext for bitching about U2.

Regarding #1: putting "Wild Honey" on my best-of list will piss off two broad categories of people. First, it will annoy all the elitists who don't think U2 has been relevant since 1991 (or who, in retrospect, don't think they've ever been relevant). A lot of people who like good music think that U2, at their best, were nothing more than a particularly canny bunch of derivative rip-off artists who never had an original idea in their lives. Those people are wrong and stupid. The relative simplicity of U2's formula (layering textured guitars over hard rock rhythm) should never obfuscate the fact that they are better at using it than any band in the history of rock. Furthermore, Bono's peculiar brand of camera-whoring automessianism shouldn't lead us to forget what a subtle and complex persona he was once capable of projecting. War, U2's first brilliant album, was all punk rock; The Joshua Tree was an album full of anti-American Americana; and U2's best album, Achtung, Baby, played everything conceivable--theology, philosophy, politics, even romance--to the tune of Eurotrash erotica. Face facts: U2 really was once one of the best bands ever.

Regarding #2: it will also piss off all the people who buy into Bono's latent automessianism. Now, I haven't heard anything off of their latest album (the one with "horizon" in the title) except "Magnificent," but I did buy the atomic bomb album the day it came out, and I can personally attest that it is a five-alarm clusterfuck. God what an irredeemably wretched album. The best pop songs, "City of Blinding Lights" and "Original of the Species" lunge inexplicably in the general directly of profundity and miss. The political songs are criminally oversimplified, and the religious songs are trite. "Magnificent" is a good song, yes, but it lacks the complexity that made U2's best religious songs ("I Still Haven't Found What I'm Looking For" and "Until the End of the World") so rewarding. The best thing you can say about U2 now is that they're boring.

Then there is the song itself. This is the best pure pop song U2 has ever produced. Bono must have been on Xanax--something to turn off his insatiable need to sound Important. "Wild Honey" is so wonderful because it is content to be what it is: a sincere song about love and longing, one that starts with a playful metaphor (humanity's distant ancestors bearing humanity's best qualities) and never overextends it. The best thing I can say for "Wild Honey" is that it makes me understand why the singer yearns so poignantly for his love. What more can you ask for from a love song? Exactly.